Michael Yon's Blog From the War Zone
Afghanistan is making undeniable progress, but it could all unravel

Afghanistan is making undeniable progress, but it could all unravel

19 June 2011

It's time to make big decisions. These decisions will have a huge impact on the future of Afghanistan. The biggest question at hand: How many troops will we keep here and for how long?

The answer to that question must not be dreamed up in political strategy sessions or in focus groups. Buzzwords and abstractions won't do.

This is about real people — our soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines, our allies — and the people of Afghanistan. It's their lives that hang in the balance, and our judgment must respect the challenge they face and the progress they have made.

Let's begin with a few facts. For the strategy we used, we never had enough troops in Afghanistan to defeat our enemies and stand up a civil society. It can be argued that today, we still do not have enough.

Despite this, the coalition and the Afghans appear to finally be turning the tide in our favor, and a great deal of this can be credited to President Obama for deciding to send more troops. Unfortunately, the President has stated that we will begin bringing troops home this year.

This puts him in a bind. To keep his word, the President may have to undermine the very success that he facilitated.

And especially since the killing of Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan, others can be expected to ratchet up the political pressure on Obama should he not begin the drawdown on schedule. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the Republican frontrunner for the 2012 election, said this last week: "It's time for us to bring our troops home as soon as we possibly can, consistent with the word that comes to our generals that we can hand the country over… we've learned some important lessons in our experience in Afghanistan. I want those troops to come home based upon not politics, not based upon economics, but instead based upon the conditions on the ground determined by the generals. But I also think we've learned that our troops shouldn't go off and try and fight a war of independence for another nation. Only the Afghanis can win Afghanistan's independence from the Taliban."

Gen. David Petraeus is the boss here in Afghanistan. He has been tasked with making a recommendation on troop withdrawal. He arrived in Washington last week, where he is recommending a timetable for the drawdown of the 30,000 “surge” troops sent to the country in 2009.

Obama had promised that those troops would start coming home in July, but conditions on the ground always matter more.

On June 5, I asked Petraeus in his Kabul office for insight into his recommendation to the President. He told me he has not yet told anyone what his recommendation will be.

Many people are waiting. Not even his staff knows.

Petraeus, tapped to take over the CIA upon his retirement from this post, has accumulated a long string of unlikely successes in Iraq, and increasingly in Afghanistan. These efforts have been far more than mere war. Our people triumphed in the kinetic fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan years ago; the far greater difficulties have been the second wars fought in both countries during the long nation-building phases.

Any politician who says we are not nation building in Iraq or Afghanistan should be dismissed. Nation building is the course we chose, and nation building is what is occurring. Slowly.

In Iraq, a government was shattered and rebuilt. In Afghanistan, there was no government to shatter. Afghanistan was just an area where a lot of people lived, and today it's being built up from mud and sticks. For instance, there was not a single meter of paved road in Ghor Province.

A country is being built from scratch and nobody has more experience at the messy and difficult job of “shatter and create” than does Petraeus. He knows his business, his profession and his art, and he knows more about the current war than anyone alive. His recommendation will carry significant weight.

But while we do this critical work, our young warriors are still dying and being wounded in large numbers. People at home are asking if Afghanistan is worth the sacrifice. And then there is the economy, still struggling and endangering our country strategically. The war here is very expensive.

Is it worth it? This is a hard question. We made the judgment that this war was worth fighting when we put our warriors into the arena in the first place. We've already jumped and now we are deciding whether to land on our heads, our rears or our feet. We cannot unjump. Our people are fighting as you read this. When we ordered our military to go, we cloaked ourselves in great responsibility to support them and to achieve success.

Our troops have two responsibilities, which are tightly interwoven: Win the war and create Afghanistan. It is not the troops' place to consider the global economy. They are not to consider unfolding debacle in Libya, the long challenges in Iraq or the dark side of the moon.

And so when Petraeus makes his recommendation to the President, his recommendation should not include any consideration of the U.S. economy, the debt or jobs in America. He is the man in the arena. The man in the arena does not collect parking tickets, or work at the concession stand or concern himself with the electric bill for the stadium. He beats his opponent to the ground. Or, in this case, beats some opponents into the ground and builds a country simultaneously. His recommendation to the President should be pure, devoid of outside considerations.

We must be honest about what we can accomplish. This is a century-long process. A little Afghan girl is watching me write this opinion. She appears to be about 4 years old, and she keeps peeking around the door smiling at me while her mother is cleaning the house and her father takes care of the property. The girl follows me around the house. A storm is coming and a lightning bolt just zapped the electricity. I am unarmed but safe in Kabul, and if this little girl is lucky, and we do not abandon Afghanistan, she may one day end up in a university.

Petraeus told me that at its peak, violence in Iraq was four times higher than current violence is here. This seems about right. I can drive around Afghanistan in many places. I've been back in Kabul for almost two weeks and have not heard a single gunshot or explosion, though I did feel an earthquake.

This isn't Baghdad. During peak times in Iraq, you couldn't go 30 minutes in Baghdad without seeing or hearing something. The most dangerous city in Afghanistan is Kandahar, yet I have driven around Kandahar many times, including recently, without a shred of armor. I could never have survived this in Fallujah, Basra, Baghdad, Baquba or Mosul. I have driven this year, without troops, to places in Afghanistan where last year I would have almost certainly  been killed, such as Panjwai. You don't need thick intelligence reports to translate those realities.

Shouting at an oak tree will no not make it grow faster, and ignoring a sapling in this desert will leave it to die. An acorn was planted in 2001, and we mostly ignored it for more than half a decade while our people fought so hard in Iraq. Today, that acorn is a scrawny, 10-year-old oak tree that was so neglected until 2010 that it nearly died. Its skinny branches are still so weak that a sparrow dare not land, and while we focused on Iraq, the enemies here stayed busy nibbling away at anything green. Yet over the past year of extra care, there are clear signs of life and new growth.

Meanwhile, our enemies here are being monkey stomped. The rule of monkey stomping has never changed. Don't stop stomping until the enemy stops breathing. This enemy has earned respect for its courage, resilience and will-not-quit spirit, but there is only so much it can take.

At this rate, the Graveyard of Empires, the Undefeatables, will need a new advertising campaign. Our enemies here are turning out to be the Almost Undefeatables. The many good Afghans want to move forward. They want their kids, boys and girls, to see better days.

The bottom line is that there are unmistakable signs of progress in Afghanistan, and Gen. David Petraeus is about to make a very important recommendation.

His judgment should be trusted.


Michael Yon





You'll not want to miss this one.  It's Afghanistan like you've probably never seen it before. 

Very Respectfully,

Michael Yon





Tonight, I read a detailed message on a private forum from a highly experienced combat writer. Unfortunately, due to the bylaws of that forum I cannot reprint it. What I can say is that it sounds like the US Marines are waging death and destruction on the Taliban in a way the Taliban are not used to.  They say the Taliban are very good, though.  Average patrol finds 1 IED and kills 1 Taliban and the Marines are going night and day.  

For an idea of where they are fighting, please read this dispatch from Sangin.

I should be back in Afghanistan in three weeks.



1 2 3 4 5

Recent Comments
"顾晓岩把乐乐送回父母家,就着急忙慌的出门去了。顾大海问乐乐今天怎么放学这么早啊,乐乐不开心的进了屋。顾晓珺一人在家无聊,发现了欧阳剑的保险柜。顾晓珺试了几次密码,警报器响了。适逢欧阳淼淼回家,催顾晓珺去买车。顾晓珺让她和欧阳剑商量商量,淼淼拨通了父亲的电话。接到父亲指令,欧阳淼淼打开了保险柜,拿了钱去买车。欧阳剑问顾晓珺顾晓岩学得什么专业,顾母打电话让其帮忙找工作。顾大海顾母带着乐乐包饺子,乐乐说出了下午和任大伟去动物园看天鹅,老人家知道他俩肯定去离婚了。顾晓岩拿了离婚证之后觉得轻松多了,任大伟伤心的坐在车里哭了起来。淼淼开着新车带着狐朋狗友兜风去了,顾晓珺一人坐在家里生气。欧阳剑回来发现顾晓珺情绪不对,顾晓珺说出自己郁闷什么。自己辛辛苦苦摇的号,一直想买车,结果呢自己车没了,戒指还白条。欧阳剑一条条开始劝着顾晓珺,顾晓珺觉得有什么不对,欧阳剑要带顾晓珺去吃饭。顾晓珺想起来了,说为什么保险箱密码淼淼知道,自己却不知道。顺带着问欧阳剑存折上有多少钱,每个月工资多少,以后钱怎么花。顾晓珺拿着计算机开始算, 2016日劇線上看 ,发现欧阳剑收支账目不对。欧阳剑的工资条根本不够这些开支,顾晓珺开始审问额外收入。欧阳剑交代自己讲课做顾问的收入,开始审问顾晓珺的收入。发现顾晓珺入不敷出,顾晓珺舒心的打算去吃饭时接到顾母电话。回到顾家,看到了姐姐的离婚证。得知姐姐房子钱都没要,骂姐姐脑子进水。顾晓岩不愿意落井下石, 台灣dvd專賣店 ,说任大伟现在公司状况不好,咱家也有责任,吵架时说要不是咱爸去闹,也不会……顾大海立刻转身进了屋,躺在床上掉了眼泪。顾母劝慰着顾大海。顾晓珺对着顾晓岩后悔自己说话太冲动了,顾晓岩向妹妹坦承自己其实对以后的生活没底。但是为了乐乐,一定会撑下去,顾晓珺表示一定会陪着姐姐。此时,淼淼出了车祸。顾晓珺照顾欧阳剑情绪,要自己开车。而欧阳剑置若罔闻,带着顾晓珺一路狂飙去了医院。淼淼带着项圈自拍,欧阳剑赶到大声叫顾晓珺去叫医生。顾晓珺一问,伤的不重。交警找着顾晓珺, 韓劇線上看tv ,要顾晓珺去交警队处理后事。顾晓珺问清出事原因,是因为淼淼开车打电话,出了事捂脸扔了方向盘,撞了一排护栏,和追了别人的车尾。欧阳剑见着顾晓珺一顿说怪她对淼淼不上心。顾晓珺也爆发了,和欧阳剑吵了起来。欧阳剑懊恼,顾晓珺生气地去了交警队。任大伟一人在家孤枕难眠,想起往事伤心欲绝。顾晓珺回到家,认识到错误的欧阳剑一顿巴结。顾晓珺刚开口说话,欧阳剑就让她小声,示意女儿在家。顾晓珺问,如果她和淼淼同事落水,欧阳剑救谁。 相关的主题文章: ..."
In: Current Middle East Strategies and News Releases
by: taodvds88a
"《太陽的後裔》是韓國KBS電視台于2016年2月24日起播出的水木迷妳連續劇,由李應福導演,金恩淑、金元錫編劇, 花樣大叔偵探社dvd ,宋仲基、宋慧喬、晉久、金智媛主演[1] , 明天壹定也有好吃的飯飯~銀湯匙dvd 。本劇爲第壹部中國與韓國同步播出的韓劇。 該劇主要講述了特戰部隊海外派兵組組長劉時鎮和外科醫生姜暮煙,在韓國和派兵地區之間往返相愛的故事 應聯合國之邀, 朝5晚9:帥氣和尚愛上我dvd ,駐紮在OURCQ首都的聯合國維和部隊所屬部隊特戰警備隊大尉劉時鎮(宋仲基飾)[4] ,和外科醫生姜暮煙(宋慧喬飾)去到戰爭硝煙彌漫、疾病蔓延的烏魯克,他們在韓國和派兵地區之間往返相愛,在急迫狀況下依然互相關照壹點點靠近[5] ..."
In: Current Middle East Strategies and News Releases
by: taodvds88a

madmaxxx: wow i cant find a game that dont have 12 year old playing. thinking about coming back. where is everyone left playing??
VoW Storm: Howdy everyone! Hope you are having a great day!
-VoW-GEflash: Merry Christmas
-VoW- ARMY: waaaazzzzzuuuuuuuuuupppppp
-VoW- ARMY: Hey
-vow- killjoy: 8163450115 call me
-vow- killjoy: hey all
HossBoss: fow-squad.com new wedstie by
-VoW-GEflash: Hey Max hope all is well
madmaxxx: hello to my old friends. i miss the games....
madmaxxx: just checked the old site. its been a long time i cant believe its still up..I havent been on bhd for a long time
VoW -X-treme: my steam = xtremedfx
-VoW- Predator: I dont know if I can even remember how to get to TS.
-VoW- Predator: Hate to see the end, will try something new.
-VoW-GEflash: MAX Give it a try
Login or Join our website to post.

- VoW- Teamspeak



This Squad Is Actively Recruiting

Websites To Visit

Candles - Melts - Soaps

by †VóW† KìllnÐudé




* The -VoW- Member Coalition * (10 Countries Spanning 5 Continents)



This website is powered by Spruz